Ohr Torah Stone

Midreshet Lindenbaum
Midreshet Lindenbaum
Midreshet Lindenbaum

About us
Mabat Overseas Programs
Tushia Yeshiva, National Service and College for Israeli Women
Hadas - Women's Torah/Service Program
Bruria Scholars
Monica Dennis Goldberg Women's Rabbinical Court Advocates Program
The Max Morrison Legal Aid Center and Hotline for Women in Distress
Application form
Contact Us
Ohr Torah Stone

Rav Menachem Leibteg  Parshat Vaetchanan
  Rav Menachem Leibtag

1. QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION
2. SHIUR ON PARASHAT VAETCHANAN
3. QUESTIONS FOR FURTHER IYUN

1. QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION

PARSHAT VE'ETCHANAN

PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'

V'ZOT HA'TORAH

1. Review 4:44-45, noting how the pasuk "v'zot ha'Torah..." - the pasuk that we recite each time when the Torah is lifted for "hagbah" - is found in this week's Parsha.
In your opinion, what is the "pshat" of this pasuk in its context?
In other words, what does the word "torah" refer to:
- the entire 5 books of Chumash;
- just Sefer Devarim;
- just the first speech (that just finished);
- just the mitzvot of the (upcoming) main speech?
[Note 4:44-47 in relation to 5:1!]

2. When we recite this pasuk for "hagbah", are we using it in the same context or a wider context? Can you explain why?
Note, that we add a phrase to this pasuk. What phrase do we add, where is it from, and why do you think that we add it? In your answer, relate to 5:1-5, and the story in 5:20-28, especially 5:5&24!
[See also Parshanut section, below.]

3. Finally, see Sefer Nechemya 8:1-8, especially 8:5. How do these psukim relate to our minhag of "hagbah"? Based on these psukim, would it make more sense to perform "hagbah" BEFORE we read the Sefer Torah in public - or AFTER it has been read?
See also Shulchan Aruch Orach Chayim siman 134 (#2). Note the two minhagim, can you explain why?

TRANSITION
4. In the beginning of the Parsha, Moshe pleads with God to allow him to enter Eretz Canaan (see 3:23-29).
In your opinion, does Moshe also want to remain the leader of Bnei Yisrael, or does he just want to enter as [sort of a] 'rabbi emeritus', while allowing Yehoshua to lead the nation?
Which possibility does 3:28 support?
Relate your answer to Bamidbar 20:12 [& our conclusion in regard to this topic in our shiur on Parshat Chukat.]
Does God explain to Moshe why His answer is no?
If so, what is that answer? [Does it relate to 1:36?]
If not, can you explain why He doesn't provide an answer?

5. Note the use of the "shoresh" ayin.bet.reish. in both 3:25, 3:26 and 3:28. Does this shoresh have the same meaning in each of these psukim, or different meanings? Explain.
Now read Bamidbar 27:12-14 (see also 27:15-23).
In your opinion, is this the same story or a different one?
[How do these two accounts complement each other?
See Rashi & Chizkuni on 27:12.]
Now, note the name of the mountain that Moshe is instructed to ascend - "har ha'avarim". Note again the shoresh ayin.bet.reish!!
What is the 'real name' of this mountain - see Devarim 32:49! Based on the above questions, why do you think that the Torah refers to it as "har ha'avarim" instead of "har nevo"?
Is there a geographical reason as well for this name?
See Ramban 27:12.
[Note also the use of ayin.bet.reish. in Bamidbar 27:6-11!
Note also the use of verb "la'tet" - to give - both in 27:7 and 27:12! (cute?)]

OR LA'GOYIM
6. Read 4:4-8. How do these psukim relate to the biblical theme of God's choice of Am Yisrael's in order that they become an "or la'goyim" [a light (or model) for other nations]?
[Recall that this theme has been discussed numerous times in previous shiurim.]
Relate this pasuk to I Melachim 8:41-43.
See also Tehillim 105:1-12 and I Divrei Ha'yamim 16:8-36, noting especially 16:24-26 and 16:35.

FLASH BACKS
7. In addition to "zachor v'shamor", another major difference between the DIBROT in Yitro and in Ve'etchanan is the additional phrase "ka'asher tzivcha Hashem Elokecha" (see 5:12,16). Can you explain this addition based on the nature of the Moshe's main speech? [Relate to last week's shiur.]
Why do you think that this phrase is used specifically in these two mitzvot (shabbat & "kibud av"), and not in the others [Relate to 5:4-5.]?

Relate these two mitzvot as well to the mitzvot that were given at Mara (see Shmot 15:25) according to Rashi. Can this information provide a different reason for this phrase specifically by these two mitzvot?

AVODA ZARA L'SHEM SHAMAYIM

8. Read 4:15-20. Note the various examples of the AVODA ZARA that one is NOT supposed to make. Examine this list carefully, noting the use of the word "tavnit", and compare this list to the first chapter of Sefer Breishit. Can you identify a pattern?
Can you explain why?
Note the only other use of the word "tavnit" in Shmot 25:8-9 in relation to the Mishkan.
In your opinion, is the warning against AVODA ZARA in chapter 4 relate to someone with good intentions or bad intentions. Explain your answer, relating to 4:12-16.

PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for weekly shiur)
1. After reviewing the main points of last week's introductory shiur to Sefer Devarim, study 4:44-46 carefully.
Do these psukim relate to the speech that just finished, or the one coming up, or both?
Use 4:45 to support our conclusion in last week's shiur concerning WHEN the mitzvot of the main speech were first given.
Does the word "ayleh" go 'backward' or 'forward'?
How about the word "zot" in 4:44?
See both Rashi & Chizkuni.
Read 27:1-3, noting the word TORAH in 27:3. Considering that chapters 5->26 is the MAIN speech (of Mitzvot) in Sefer Devarim, can this help you understand the meaning of TORAH in 4:44?

2. Now, note the phrase "chukim u'mishpatim" in 4:45 as well. Relate it to the same phrase found in 5:1, 5:28, and 6:1.
How does this relate to the same phrase in 4:1 & 4:5?
Does chapter 4 include "chukim u'mishpatim", or does this opening sentence relate to the mitzvot forthcoming in the main speech?
Does chapter 4 contain "chukim u'mishpatim", or a different category of mitzvot? Explain your answer.
What is the nature of Moshe's speech in chapter 4?
In your opinion, why is it included as part of his introductory speech (chapters 1->4), after he finishes explaining why forty years have passed in chapters 1->3?
What is the nature of the MITZVOT that are listed in this chapter? How do they relate Moshe's realization that he is about to die, and will no longer be their leader? [See 4:21-24.]

3. Note that in 5:28 and 6:1, the psukim that introduce the main speech, there is a division between HA'MITZVAH and the CHUKIM & MISHPATIM.
Attempt to divide the main speech into two sections based on this distinction. To do so, study carefully 6:4-9 in relation to 11:22-25, AND 12:1 in relation to 26:16-19, noting how each pair of psukim 'balance' each other. Next, briefly scan the mitzvot of the main speech (i.e. chapters 6->26), noting the difference in the nature of the mitzvot found BETWEEN chapters 6->11 in contrast to the mitzvot found from chapters 12->26.
[This question may take you a long time to answer, but it is important, for in it lies the key to understanding the basic structure of the main speech.]

4. Note where the two parshiot of daily kriyat shma are located within the main speech. [See 6:4-9 & 11:13-21.]
Based on question #3, can this explain why these two parshiot were chosen for kriyat shma?
See the Mishneh in Sotah VII:8!

5. Recall from last week's shiur that the MITZVOT of the main speech were FIRST given to Moshe Rabeinu during his first forty days on Har Sinai. Now, examine the various parshiot in the first section of Moshe speech, i.e. from 6:10 -> 11:13, and try to determine which sections of this speech reflect the actual mitzvot that were first given at THAT time and which sections of the speech are 'added' by Moshe Rabeinu now in the fortieth year.
To answer this question, relate to how these mitzvot consider the people's recollection of the events that took place during Yetziat Mitzraim and during their journey to Har Sinai.
Pay special attention to 6:16, 6:20-23, 7:17-19, & 11:10-12.
Note also the opening psukim of chapter 8!
& compare 7:6-9 with 9:4-7!

PARSHAT VE'ETCHANAN
The first two parshiot of "kriyat shma" surround us each and every day of our lives. Not only do we recite them at least twice daily, but they are also written on every doorpost (i.e. on every "mezuzah"), and in the boxes of our "tfilin". What makes them so special?
This week's shiur, which analyzes the overall structure of the main speech of Sefer Devarim, we help us better appreciate why specifically these two parshiot are so important.

INTRODUCTION : REVIEW

Recall from last week's introductory shiur how the first 26 chapters of Sefer Devarim divide into two speeches: (1) An introductory speech (chapters 1-4), in which Moshe explains why forty years have passed since Bnei Yisrael should have entered the land;
& (2) the main speech (chapters 5-26), in which Moshe reviews the special set of mitzvot (originally given at Har Sinai) which the people must now keep, as they prepare to enter the land of Israel.

In contrast to that shiur which focused on 'introductions', [i.e. we studied chapter 5 which explained when and how these mitzvot were first given], this week's shiur focusses on how the mitzvot themselves are presented in the main speech. We will show how and why the mitzvot of this main speech divide neatly into two distinct sections:
A) The Ha'Mitzva section, which focuses on proper attitude; [which emerges sort of like a "musar" sefer].
B) The Chukim u'Mishpatim section, which focusses more on more specific mitzvot [sort of like a "shulchan aruch"].

First, we will explain the technical (i.e. textual) reason for this division, then we will discuss its significance.

SETTING THE FRAMEWORK

In chapter five, Moshe Rabeinu began his main speech by explaining how and when the mitzvot (which he is about to review) were first given - i.e. after the Ten Commandments when Bnei Yisrael requested to hear the remaining mitzvot from Moshe instead of directly from God (see 5:20-26 & last week's shiur).
Let's pay careful attention to the wording of God's positive response to the people's request, for it sets the framework for this entire set of mitzvot:

"Go say to them: 'Return to your tents', but you remain here with Me and I will give you the mitzva & the chukim u'mishpatim which you shall teach them..." (5:27-28).
Note the key words - (A) ha'mitzva and (B) chukim & mishpatim - in this pasuk. Now, continue reading carefully until three psukim later, where Moshe repeats this key phrase once again - when he actually introduces those mitzvot:
"And this is the mitzva and the chukim u'mishpatim that God has commanded me to teach you to observe on the land..." (6:1)
[Note as well how this introduction continues until 6:3, and how the mitzvot themselves begin with "shma" in 6:4!]

As we proceed, we will see how this key phrase sets the stage for the division of the entire speech into two sections, corresponding to these two headers:

A) the Ha'Mitzva section - chapters 6-11
[Parshiot V'etchanan thru Ekev]
B) the Chukim & Mishpatim section - chapters 12-26
[Parshiot Re'ah, Shoftim, Ki-teze, & Kitavo]
'HEADERS' & 'FOOTERS'
To prove this division, we simply need to skip ahead to the beginning of chapter 12 in Parshat Reah. Note how those psukim clearly introduce a new unit and thus form a 'header':
"These are the chukim & mishpatim that you are to keep in the land which God gave to your forefathers..." (12:1)
As we should suspect, this introductory pasuk is followed by a lengthy list of mitzvot that Bnei Yisrael must keep upon entering the land - which continues on all the way until the end of chapter 26! There, as we should expect, this list concludes with a very appropriate summary pasuk (what we call a 'footer'):
"God commands you today to keep these chukim & mishpatim, keep them with all your heart... " (26:16)
[Scan the chapters in between (if you don't believe me) to verify that there are no 'new headers' in the interim. Note also how many parshiot begin with "ki" & "lo"!]

Now that we have found the very obvious 'header' and 'footer' of the Chukim u'Mishpatim section, we can work 'backwards' and identify the less obvious 'header' & 'footer' of the Mitzva section.
Let's start by taking a closer look at the pasuk which opens the mitzvot of the main speech (as we explained above, i.e. 6:4):

"Hear o Israel, the Lord is our God... and you shall love God with all your heart and all your soul... and these instructions which I "m'tzaveh" [command] you today, teach them to your children..." (6:4-6)
Note how this phrase: "v'hayu ha'devarim ha'eyleh asher anochi m'tzaveh etchem..." (6:6) [and these instructions that I command you today] introduces the mitzvot which follow. Thus, this pasuk could be considered as the 'header' to the Mitzva section.

In a similar manner, towards the end of this unit we find a very 'worthy candidate' for a closing pasuk:

"If, then, you faithfully keep - ha'mitzva hazot - that I command you, to love God.... to follow His laws and to attach yourselves to Him. " (see 11:22)
Here, not only do we find our key word - ha'mitzva, but it's context suggests that it could be considered as a conclusion (or the 'footer') of this entire section. [Later in the shiur we will explain the small set of psukim which form a 'buffer' between these two sections, i.e. 11:23-29.]

Up until now, we have found textual support for dividing the mitzvot of the main speech into two distinct sections. Now, we must find the primary theme of each section by examining their contents.

SECTION #1 - HA'MITZVAH: "Ahavat Hashem"

The theme of the Ha'Mitzva section is quite easy to identify, for its opening pasuk - the famous pasuk of "Shma Yisrael" says it all:

"Shma Yisrael... and you shall love God with all your heart and soul... and these laws which I "m'tzaveh" you..." (see 6:4-6)
Note how this general theme of 'to love God in every walk of life' continues in each subsequent parshia which follows. For example:

* Upon conquering the land, you may inherit an entire city with houses already built and vineyards already planted, etc. Don't let this affluence cause you to forget God... (see 6:10-15).
* When your children (who did not go through the desert experience) will ask you why we have to keep all these mitzvot, remind them and teach them about all the events of Yetziat Mitzrayim... (6:20-25)
* When you conquer your enemy, don't intermarry! etc. (7:1-5)
* If you become fearful of your enemy, don't worry, remember what God did to Mitzrayim, He can help you as well... (7:17-25) * Don't act in a rebellious manner as your forefathers did in the desert (chapters 8-10).
* As Eretz Canaan does not have a constant water source (like the Nile in Egypt), you will be dependent on the rainfall in this new land. Therefore, recognize that it is God who gives you rain (and not any other god / see 11:10-15).
This theme is so predominant in chapters 6-11, that its mitzvot appear to be quite redundant. Each parsha discusses in one form or other a different aspect of one's proper attitude towards God [what we call "ahavat Hashem"]. In fact, when we examine this unit more carefully, we find that these mitzvot simply apply this theme of "ahavat Hashem" to the various situations which will arise as Bnei Yisrael will enter the land. To verify this, see 6:10,18; 7:1,13,16,22; 8:1,7; 9:1,4-6; 11:10-12,13-17, & 22-25!

Furthermore, note how the concluding parshia of this section promises Bnei Yisrael with a reward should they indeed follow God with the proper attitude:

"If, then, you faithfully keep - ha'mitzva hazot - that I command you, to love God.... to follow His laws... then God will help you conquer these nations... every foot step that you take will become your land [to its widest borders]... No man shall stand up against you... (see 11:22-25)
This promise forms an appropriate conclusion to this Mitzvah section, as God promises Bnei Yisrael His assistance in their conquest of the land, should they indeed keep the proper attitude towards Him.

And for a finale, the final psukim of chapter 11 (see 11:26-30) conclude this section by promising a blessing or a curse on the land, depending if Bnei Yisrael continue to keep this mitzva (or not) once they settle the land.
[Note how this 'mini-Tochacha' continues in chapter 27 (after the main speech is over). Iy"h, we'll deal with this structure in the shiur on Parshat Ki-Tavo.]

KRIYAT SHMA

With this background, we can better appreciate Chazal's choice of the first two parshiot of "kriyat shma".
Recall that the opening parsha of the Mitzva section was none other than the first parsha of "kriyat shma" (6:4-9). Recall also that this section ended with the concluding psukim in 11:22-25. Now, the parsha which precedes these finale psukim is none other than the second parsha of "kriyat shma" - "v'haya im shmoah..." (see 11:13-21 to verify this)!
In other words, the first two parshiot of "kriyat shma" form the bookends of the Mitzva section, for it begins with "Shma Yisrael... v'ahavta" (6:4-8) and ends with "v'haya im shmoah... " (11:13-21).
This could explain why Chazal chose that we read both these parshiot to fulfill our daily obligation of Torah study [which is based on 6:6 -"v'hayu ha'devarim ha'eyla asher anochi m'tzaveh..."]. Theoretically, based on this pasuk, one should be required to read daily the entire Mitzva section. However, since this section is too lengthy, we recite instead its opening and closing parshiot. However, by reading these two parshiot, it is as though we have read (and hopefully internalized) all of the mitzvot of the Mitzva section.
[The Mishnah at the end of the seventh perek of Mesechet Sota arrives at a similar conclusion in regard to reading Sefer Devarim at the Hakhel ceremony (see Sota 41a). There, instead of reading the entire speech, the custom was to read the first parsha of Shma (6:4-8) and then skip to the last parsha of Shma (11:13-21).]

SECTION #2 - THE CHUKIM & MISHPATIM UNIT

As your read the conclusion of chapter 11, note the smooth transition from the mitzva section into the Chukim u'Mishpatim section. Again, note the key phrases and theme:

"... Now that you are crossing the Jordan to inherit the Land... keep these chukim & mishpatim that I am teaching you today."
(11:31-32) With this transition, we flow right into the opening pasuk of section #2, which details these laws:
"These are the chukim & mishpatim that you are to keep in the land which God gave to your forefathers..." (12:1)
The many chapters which follow this opening pasuk contain numerous laws which Bnei Yisrael must keep upon entering the land. However, in contrast to the laws relating to proper attitude in the Ha'Mitzva section, the laws in Section #2 are more specific in nature. For example, we find laws concerning when and where to build the permanent Bet Ha'Mikdash (chapter 12), dietary laws (chapter 14), laws of "aliyah la'regel" on the Holidays (chapter 16), laws about appointing judges and political leaders (chapter 17), and a full assortment of civil laws (chapters 19-25).
This list continues until the end of chapter 26. [Recall, that chapter 27 begins a new speech.]

As we should expect, this unit also contains a very appropriate conclusion:

"God commands you today to keep these chukim & mishpatim, keep them with all your heart and soul. You have affirmed this day that the Lord is your God, that you will walk in His ways... The Lord has affirmed this day that you are, as He promised, His am segula... and you shall be, as He promised [at Har Sinai] a holy nation to the Lord your God." (see 26:16-19)
[In the shiurim to follow, we will deal with the nature of the mitzvot of this unit in more detail.]

In summary, we have identified the two very distinct sections of the main speech of Sefer Devarim and explained the nature of their distinction:

A) The Ha'Mitzva section (6-11) contains several mitzvot and various rebukes that encourage Bnei Yisrael to keep the proper attitude toward God as they conquer the land.
B) The Chukim & Mishpatim section contains an assortment of more specific laws which Bnei Yisrael must follow once they inherit the land.

Now, we can suggest a reason for this manner of presentation.

THE PROPER BALANCE

So what section is more important? The Mitzva section - which deals with proper attitude [sort of like a MUSAR sefer], or the Chukim & Mishpatim section - which details the specific mitzvot that one must keep [sort of like a Shulchan Aruch]? [Any "yeshiva bachur" faces this dilemma every time he sets up his daily schedule. How much time to dedicate to "musar" and how much time to "halacha".]

The summary pasuk of Section #2 (quoted above) alludes to the proper balance between them:

"This day, God commands you to keep these Chukim & Mishpatim, and you should keep them with all your heart and all your soul..." (26:16)
This 'finale' closes not only the Chukim & Mishpatim section, but also beautifully relates it back to the Mitzva section. These "chukim u'mishpatim" must be kept with all your heart and soul -"b'chal l'vavcha u'vchal naf'shecha". Note once again the textual parallel between this closing pasuk and the opening pasuk of the first section: "v'ahavta et Hashem Elokecha - b'chal l'vavcha u'vchal nafshecha" - and you shall love God with all your heart and all your soul..." (see 6:5, compare with 26:16)

This obvious parallel emphasizes that these specific laws of the "chukim u'mishpatim" section must be kept with the proper attitude of "ahavat Hashem", as explained in the first section!
Only with the solid base of "ahavat Hashem" is it possible to fulfill the more specific laws in the proper manner. And only with a comprehensive set of specific laws is it possible maintain "ahavat Hashem" as a daily way of life.
FOR FURTHER IYUN

A. BACK TO HAR SINAI
To better appreciate this entire unit and its concluding remarks, we must recall that the mitzvot of this main speech should actually be considered an integral part of Ma'amad Har Sinai. [Recall from last week's shiur that it was God's original intention was to give these mitzvot directly to Bnei Yisrael immediately after the Ten Commandments!] With this in mind, carefully read the final psukim of the speech, noting their thematic (and textual) parallel to the Torah's description of Ma'amad Har Sinai in Sefer Shmot (especially Shmot 19:3-6).
Note how these psukim reflect the covenant made between God and Bnei Yisrael at Har Sinai:
"... You have taken upon yourselves today that He will be your God and that you will follow His ways and laws... - God has affirmed on this day that you will be His special people - "am segula"... as He spoke to you [at Har Sinai (see Shmot 19:5-6)]. And to set you above all nations to be His glory and Name (reputation)... that you shall be an "am kadosh" as He spoke to you [at Har Sinai]." (26:16-19)
Considering that these mitzvot are an integral component of Ma'amad Har Sinai, it is only fitting that Moshe concludes this speech by summarizing the most basic elements and purpose of that covenant.

B. SOME 'ADDITIONS'

Go through the Ha'Mitzva section of Sefer Devarim (i.e. chapters 6-11) and try to determine which parshiot were 'added' now by Moshe in the fortieth year and which parshiot seem to be a word for word repeat of what God had first commanded him on Har Sinai forty years earlier.
1. Note that many mitzvot sound as though Moshe Rabeinu is speaking to Bnei Yisrael as they left Egypt, and as though they themselves went out of Egypt and witnessed the plagues etc.
Does the above distinction explain this?
3. See 6:16, why is "masa" the only or best example of a rebellion against God? When did this rebellion take place? Wasn't here a more recent rebellion? (e.g. Mei meriva...)
4. Compare 7:7-11 to 9:4-7, use the above observation to explain the apparent discrepancy between these psukim.
5. What is chapter 8 clearly an 'add on'? Does this 'add on' fit in thematically to the main topic of the Ha'Mitzva section?

C. TWO TYPES OF "YIRAH" - A mini-shiur

As we discussed in last week's shiur, chapter 5 details the events which took place at Ma'amad Har Sinai when Bnei Yisrael were overcome with fear. In Sefer Shmot (see 20:14-18), we find what appears to be a parallel account of the same event.
Let's compare them.
We begin with the account in Sefer Devarim, when Bnei Yisrael request that Moshe Rabeinu act as an intermediary immediately after the completion of the Ten Commandments:

"Let us not die, then, for this fearsome fire will consume us; if we hear the voice of God any longer, we shall die! For what mortal ever heard the voice of the living God speak out of the fire, as we did, and lived? You go closer and hear all that Hashem says; then you tell us everything that Hashem tells you, and we will listen and do it." (5:22-24)

God concedes to this request [note the positive aspect attributed to this fear]:

"I have heard the plea that this people made to you; they did well to speak thus. May they always be of such mind, to revere Me and follow all my Commandments..."
Sefer Shmot records a very similar incident that took place immediately following the Ten Commandments, which according to some commentators (see Ibn Ezra) describes the same event:
"All the people saw the thunder and lightning..., and when the people saw it, they fell back and stood at a distance and asked Moshe: You speak to us and we will listen, but let not God speak to us, less we die. Moshe answered them: Be not afraid, for God has come only in order to test you, and in order that the fear of Him may be with you forever..."
(Shmot 20:15-17)
Although Rashi and Ramban explain this event (in Shmot) took place either before or during the Ten Commandments, for the purpose of this mini-shiur, we will follow Ibn Ezra's shita which understands that both accounts describe the same event.

There is one major discrepancy between these two accounts: In Sefer Shmot, Moshe is not pleased with this fear, while in Sefer Devarim, God praises it!
It seems as though Moshe prefers that Bnei Yisrael confront God directly during Ma'amad Har Sinai, while God Himself endorses a more distanced relationship. Could this discrepancy reflect a dispute between Moshe and God regarding the value of fearing God?
An understanding of the two forms of "yirat Hashem" - the fear of God - can help us appreciate this controversy.

TYPE I: Positive (or Constructive) Fear
When one recognizes God's infinite greatness, even though he may be enthralled with the possibility of encountering the Almighty, out of humility he feels that it be improper to confront Him directly. This fear is commendable, for it reflects an ideal balance between possible closeness and necessary distance.

TYPE II: Negative Fear
On the other hand, a person not interested in any relationship with God would view a divine encounter such as Har Sinai as a nuisance, for it is meaningless to him. Fearful of its inherent danger, he prefers distance and limited responsibility. This type of fear of God, like a 'child running away from school', can ruin a relationship.

THE MACHLOKET
It seems that Moshe Rabeinu, based on his experience with Bnei Yisrael since the time of the Exodus, is concerned that the people's fear stems from the latter reason. Therefore, he is unhappy with Bnei Yisrael's request that he act as their intermediary. He encourages them to stay at Har Sinai.
God, on the other hand, aware of the nature of man's haughtiness, stresses the positive aspect of this fear. He agrees with Bnei Yisrael's request, sends them to their tents, and gives the mitzvot to them thru Moshe instead.

Nonetheless, when the mitzvot of the main speech actually begin, we find a beautiful resolution of this conflict.
Because God is indeed aware of Moshe's worry that there is a danger of the distance caused by "yirat Hashem", God chooses to begin the mitzvot which He gives via Moshe to Bnei Yisrael with the commandment of "ahavat Hashem" - the love of God!

"Shma Yisrael... and you must love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might..." (6:4-5)
To counter this potential danger of 'too much yira', God begins with the mitzvah of ahavat Hashem! The love of God and the proper appreciation of His laws assure that one's fear will strengthen his relationship, rather than weaken it.

For more articles by Rav Menachem Leibtag, visit his web site,  www.tanach.org

Missed a Parsha?  Visit our Parsha Archives