1. QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION 1. As you read the opening pasuk of Parshat Beshalach (13:17), attempt to explain the phrase "ki karov hu". Did you translate "ki" - 'because', or 'even though'? How would this affect how you understand this pasuk? For a discussion on this topic, see first Ibn Ezra (aroch) and Chizkuni. Note the other examples that they bring. Then see Ramban.
2. In your opinion, when Bnei Yisrael left Egypt, did the people know for sure where they were going to?
Did they realize that they were supposed to 'stop on the way' at Har Chorev? If so, for what purpose: to thank God; or to receive the Torah; or both?
3. When Bnei Yisrael first left Egypt, for how long (in your opinion) did they expect to be traveling for in the desert (until reaching the Promised Land)?
4. Review 14:1-4, noting how God instructs Bnei Yisrael to do a maneuver. Does this appear to be a trick? In your opinion, does there appear to be a 'moral' problem with this?
5. As you review "shirat ha'yam" (15:1-19), note how just about all of the psukim describe the events of how the sea split and how Egyptians were killed and Bnei Yisrael were saved. However, towards the end of the "shira" [song] we find a slightly different topic. PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for weekly shiur)
1. In your opinion, what was the purpose of "Kriyat Yam Suf":
2. After crossing the Red Sea, Bnei Yisrael finally began their travel into the desert. Based on their original request that Pharaoh allow them a three day journey to worship their God, where 'should' Bnei Yisrael now travel to? For what purpose?
3. Note how many situations of peril arise in Parshat Beshalach whereupon Bnei Yisrael complain to God. In your opinion, do these situations arise by chance, or are they intentional (i.e. are they part of God's plan)? If so, what was the purpose of each?
4. Chart the events that transpire in Parshat Beshalach, as Bnei Yisrael travel towards Har Sinai. Is there a pattern? A purpose?
5. The famous story of Moshe hitting the rock begins when Bnei Yisrael are encamped in Rfidim (17:1). PART III - PARSHANUT 1. In 14:9-12, Bnei Yisrael - with their 'backs to the sea' and Egypt attacking - cry out to God for help. Moshe responds to Bnei Yisrael as follows (14:13): "Do not fear, stand strong and witness God's deliverance today - FOR in the way which you see Mitzrayim today - LO TOSIFU Li'ROTAM AD OLAM - you will NEVER SEE THEM AGAIN...As your read this pasuk (noting its context), attempt to determine whether it is a PROMISE or a COMMANDMENT? If it is a promise, is it a promise for only this generation, or for all generations (read pasuk carefully)? How did you explain the word "derech" in this pasuk? Then, see Rashi on 14:13 - How does he explain this pasuk? Next, see Ramban (on 14:13), quoting Chazal. Note that he claims that this pasuk is indeed to be understand as a COMMANDMENT!
Can you explain, according to Chazal, precisely what this commandment entails? Does it apply only to Egypt?
Would you consider this interpretation as "pshat"? "He (the king) must not gather too many horses (i.e. for chariots & calvary to strengthen his army), and he must not return the people to MITZRAYIM in order to add horses, FOR God has already warned you - LO TOSIFU LA'SHUV b'DERECH HA'ZEH OD - you must not go back this way again.How does this statement relate textually and thematically to the psukim above at Kriyat Yam Suf (Shmot 14:13)? Attempt to explain how Chazal's interpretation of 14:13 as a COMMANDMENT may be based on this pasuk in Devarim. Next, read Devarim 28:68 (noting its context, it's the final pasuk of the Tochacha in Ki-tavo). How do you understand the phrase "ba'derech asher amarti - LO TOSIF OD Li'ROTAH..." - What is the meaning of "ba'derch" in this phrase? [Will those who will be 'deported' to Egypt WANT someone to buy them? / read 26:68 carefully] Does this pasuk support Chazal's pirush in Shmot 14:13? [See also Yeshayahu 31:1-3 & Yerushalmi Succah V.1. (23a)]
2. In 17:14, God instructs Moshe to write down the story of what Amalek did in a SEFER. In your opinion, what "sefer" is this, and what was the purpose in writing it down?
3. Read 15:25 in the context of 15:23-26.
2. SHIUR ON PARSHAT BESHALACH
Along their journey from Egypt towards Har Sinai, Bnei Yisrael encounter frightening war and life-threatening shortages of food and water. Are they expected not to complain, to passively accept this fate and just sit back and wait patiently for God's salvation? Is God simply 'testing' their patience? PART I - ALL ON THE WAY TO HAR SINAI
INTRODUCTION
THREE DAYS OR SEVEN WEEKS?
A SECOND CHANCE
THE NEW PLAN
Despite the distinctive nature of each of these events, they all share a common purpose; we posit that the purpose of each incident is to help prepare Bnei Yisrael for Matan Torah. In other words, God INTENTIONALLY initiates these events IN ORDER to catalyze Bnei Yisrael's spiritual growth, to 'train' them to become His Nation! To appreciate the specific purpose of each individual event, we must first consider WHY Bnei Yisrael had not performed proper "teshuva" in Egypt.
BREAKING SLAVE MENTALITY 1) A traumatic experience - which will usually facilitate a sudden change.1) KRIYAT YAM SUF - SPLITTING OLD TIES Kriyat Yam Suf [the splitting of the Red Sea] may be understood as a traumatic experience that helps Bnei Yisrael break their instinctive dependence on Mitzraim. At Kriyat Yam Suf, God inflicts His final punishment upon Pharaoh and his army (14:4). Were God's sole intention merely to punish the Egyptians, He could have done so during the Ten Plagues. The fact that Bnei Yisrael must witness Kriyat Yam Suf suggests that these events occur for their sake as well. This purpose becomes clearer in light of Bnei Yisrael's reaction to the imminent threat of the approaching Egyptian army: "And they complained to Moshe saying... What have you done to us by taking us out of Egypt? Is this not the very thing WE TOLD YOU IN EGYPT: Let us be and WE WILL SERVE THE EGYPTIANS, for it is better for us to SERVE the Egyptians than die in the desert?!" (14:11-12)[See Ibn Ezra on 14:13 where he explains why Bnei Yisrael did not even consider confronting the Egyptians in battle.] God responds to Bnei Yisrael's complaint by commanding them to break away from this instinctive dependence: "Do not fear, stand upright and watch God's salvation... for the manner in which you see Mitzraim today - you will NEVER SEE THEM AGAIN." ["LO TOSIFU li'rotam od ad olam."] (14:13) Although God's reassurance appears to be a PROMISE, for some reason Chazal interpret this statement as a COMMANDMENT! According to Ramban (14:13), Chazal interpret this pasuk as follows: "In the manner by which you look at Mitzraim today - DO NOT LOOK AT THEM THIS WAY EVER AGAIN." (14:13)God here does NOT promise His nation that they will never face an Egyptian army again. Rather, He COMMANDS them to 'never again' look to Egypt for their salvation. Although this interpretation of "Lo tosifu li'rotam" does not appear to be the simple "pshat" of this pasuk, it does find support in a parallel reference in the "Tochacha" in Parshat Ki-tavo (note Devarim 28:1-69). At the conclusion of that Tochacha, God warns Bnei Yisrael that should they disobey Him, they will be exiled and sold into slavery (see Devarim 28:62-67 / note "ki lo SHMATA b'kol Hashem..."). Their condition will deteriorate to such an extent, the Torah warns, that they will actually HOPE that someone will 'purchase them as slaves'. To emphasize this point, note how the Torah employs this same phrase that it used at Kriyat Yam Suf: "And God will return you to Egypt in ships, in the manner that I told you: 'LO TOSIF OD LI'ROTA" [Do not look at them this way again], and you will offer yourselves to your enemies for sale as slaves and maidservants, but no one will purchase you." (28:68)[The word "ba'derech" - "in the manner" - should not be understood as a description of the ship-route to Egypt, but rather as a description of the crisis Am Yisrael will face as they are exiled to Egypt in those ships.] Ironically, the last stage of the "tochacha" has Am Yisrael returning to the same state they were in before they left Egypt, where they yearn for total dependence on their human masters, in Egypt! [See also Devarim 17:16 & Yeshayahu 31:1-3 to support this interpretation of LO TOSIFU.] God's plan appears to succeed. Upon seeing the drowning of the Egyptians in the sea, Bnei Yisrael indeed reach the proper conclusion: "...and Yisrael recognized His great Hand.. and the people FEARED GOD and BELIEVED in God and Moshe His servant." (Shmot 14:30-31)Instinctively, Bnei Yisrael respond in a song of praise to God: "Az ya'shir Moshe u'bnei Yisrael..." (see 15:1)2) MARA - A DESERT SEMINAR After crossing the Red Sea, Bnei Yisrael set out on their 'three-day journey' into the desert. However, instead of arriving at Har Sinai, they arrive at Mara, where the only water they could find is bitter and undrinkable. Having severed their ties with Egypt, Bnei Yisrael now have the perfect opportunity to accept God's commandments and 'cure' their attitude problem of "V'LO SHAMMU EL MOSHE..." "And He said - iym SHMOA TISH'MA l'kol Hashem Elokecha - Should you LISTEN to the voice of God, and do what is proper in His eyes, and listen to His commandments, then the affliction that I put on the Egyptians I will not put on you, for I am God your Healer." (15:26 / See shiur on Parshat Va'eyra.)
Now 'it's official' - Bnei Yisrael agree to obey God and follow His laws; the 'bitter' water of Mara becomes drinkable. By linking the sweetness of the water to Bnei Yisrael's willingness to obey Him and follow His laws, God teaches them an important lesson about spiritual dependence. [The 'message' of the "eytz" which God instructs Moshe to cast into the water (see 15:23-25) may relate back to Gan Eden, the motif of an environment that demands obedience to God. The famous "drash" of "ein mayim ela Torah," that the term "water" in Tanach actually refers to Torah, almost emerges as "pshat"! See also Mishlei 3:18 and its context ("etz chayim hi l'machazakim bah...").]
3) MIDBAR SIN - BASIC TRAINING "If only we had died by the Hand of God in Egypt, when we had plenty of meat and bread to eat! Now you have brought us out into this desert to die of famine." (16:3)The tone of this complaint indicates that Bnei Yisrael had retained their instinctive dependence upon Mitzraim. They react to hunger by reminiscing about the 'good old days' in Egypt. The trauma they had experienced heretofore was not sufficient to totally change their character. They require a DAILY ROUTINE that will slowly change their instinctive behavior. The manna served this very purpose. It provided a daily routine that transformed their physical dependence on Mitzraim into a physical dependence on God. As explained in Sefer Devarim: "And He tormented you and starved you, then gave you 'manna' to eat... IN ORDER TO TEACH YOU that man does not live on bread alone, rather, man lives by whatever God commands." (Devarim 8:3)By allowing Bnei Yisrael to gather only enough food for one day at a time, Bnei Yisrael learn to become dependent solely on God. To emphasize this point, their food falls directly from heaven. Note how the Torah uses a key word - "nisayon" (a test) in its description: "Behold I will rain down bread for you from the heavens, and the people shall go out and gather each day that day's portion - l'maan A'NA'SENU (="nisayon") - IN ORDER THAT I MAY TEST THEM, to see whether or not they WILL FOLLOW MY INSTRUCTIONS..." (16:4)The word "nisayon" here should not be understood simply as a test to assess Bnei Yisrael's relationship with God. A Divine 'test' is not for God but rather for man - it serves to raise man to a higher level. The classic example is the story of the Akeyda ["v'Hashem NISA et Avraham..."], where God 'tests' Avraham (see Breishit 22:1) - not to find out IF he is worthy, but rather TO MAKE him worthy. The manna served a similar purpose. God is not testing Bnei Yisrael to find out IF they will obey Him, rather He is TRAINING them in order that they learn how to obey Him.
4) RFIDIM - PREPARING FOR HAR SINAI
5) THE WAR WITH AMALEK - LOOKING UP TO HAR SINAI
FROM PESACH TO SHAVUOT
PART II - AMALEK - V'LO YA'RAY ELOKIM
WHO'S IN RFIDIM? "And Amalek came, and attacked Israel at RFIDIM..." (see Shmot 17:8)When we read these psukim, we generally assume that ALL of Bnei Yisrael are encamped in Refidim when Amalek attacked. However, a careful reading of the previous 'parsha' - the story of MASSA U'MRIVA - suggests quite the opposite! When Amalek attacks, Bnei Yisrael appear to be 'on the road' - on their WAY from Refidim TO HAR SINAI. To prove this, we must review the story of MASA U'MRIVA, which begins with Bnei Yisrael's arrival at Refidim: "And Bnei Yisrael traveled from MIDBAR SIN... and encamped in RFIDIM, and there was NO WATER for the people to drink... and they quarreled with Moshe..." (17:1-3)We all know how the story continues. God instructs Moshe to take his staff and STRIKE the ROCK. Water then gushes forth from the rock and Bnei Yisrael quench their thirst - end of story. Not so fast... As we saw in Part I, there is one small detail in this story that is often overlooked. The rock that Moshe hits is NOT in Refidim - it is located at HAR SINAI! "God said to Moshe, PASS BEFORE the people, TAKE with you SOME OF THE ELDERS, and take the staff... I will be standing before you at the ROCK at CHOREV; strike the rock [there] and water will issue from it..." (17:5-6)In other words, God tells Moshe to go to CHOREV (= Har Sinai/ see 3:1,12), taking along a select group of national leaders to witness this miracle at the rock. Although the Torah informs us that Moshe performed this miracle in the presence of these elders (17:6), we find NO details of precisely how Bnei Yisrael drank this water. Considering that the rock is at Chorev and the people are at Refidim, it is unlikely that the elders carried back with them a sufficient supply of water to provide for the entire camp. More likely, the running water of Har Chorev created a small riverbed, which meandered its way to Refidim. That water was enough for the people to have something to drink. But think about it - if you had spent several days suffering from life-threatening thirst in a hot desert with no water available to you or your family, and then you saw a new river bed forming, you (and everyone else in your camp) would follow that river right to its source! Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that Bnei Yisrael, upon seeing this water, immediately decided to move their camp from Refidim directly to Har Sinai. One could also assume that this journey was not very organized. The stronger people most probably ran ahead to secure for themselves a supply of fresh water and set up the new campsite, while those who were 'weak and tired' lingered behind.
AMALEK ATTACKS "Remember what Amalek did to you BA'DERECH (on your journey) when you left Egypt - for he surprised you BA'DERECH [i.e. while you were traveling] and cut down ALL THE STRAGGLERS IN YOUR REAR, while you were FAMISHED & WEARY..." (25:17-18)Amalek capitalizes on Bnei Yisrael's disadvantage. [They break the laws of the 'Geneva Convention.'] Even in war there are accepted norms of conduct; men fight men, armies engage armies. Amalek's attack is outright unethical, even by wartime standards.
YIRAT ELOKIM "...v'LO YA'RAY ELOKIM - and he (Amalek) did not fear God."This phrase - YA'RAY ELOKIM - in the context of unethical (or immoral) behavior is found numerous times in Chumash. For example, Avraham offers Avimelech the following explanation for lying about his wife: "And Avraham explained (to Avimelech), for I said (to myself) there is no YIRAT ELOKIM in this place, and therefore they will kill me (to take my wife)…" (Breishit 20:11)In this context, a lack of YIRAT ELOKIM describes one who would kill a visitor in order to take his wife. [Quite unethical according to even the lowest moral standards.] Similarly, Yosef bases his decision to release his imprisoned brothers on his sense of YIRAT ELOKIM - ethical behavior: "... ET HA'ELOKIM ANI YA'RAY... [therefore] only one of you must remain in jail and the rest of you can bring food to your family and bring back your youngest brother [to prove that you are telling the truth]..." (See Breishit 42:15-18)THE COUNTER ATTACK This interpretation also explains an enigmatic detail in the Torah's description of the counterattack, as presented in Parshat Beshalach. When Moshe hears of Amalek's attack, he instructs Yehoshua to launch a counteroffensive - MACHAR - on the following day: "Go fight Amalek... MACHAR - TOMORROW - I (Moshe) will be standing at the top of the hill with the MATEH ELOKIM..." (17:9/ See Ibn Ezra - "givah" = Har Sinai!)Should not Yehoshua engage Amalek immediately? Why wait for another day of hostilities to pass before mobilizing the nation's defense? According to our explanation, however, the leaders (Moshe & the elders) and most of the men are already at Har Sinai. It will therefore take a full day for Yehoshua to organize the troops and march them back towards Refidim.
SPOILING HAR SINAI Am Yisrael must remain prepared to fight this battle against Amalek for all generations: "ki yad al kes Kah, MILCHAMA l'HASHEM b'AMALEK, m'dor dor." (17:16) For more articles by Rav Menachem Leibtag, visit his web site, www.tanach.org
|
||||||||||||||||||