|
|
|
|
|
Parshat
Beshalach: From
Sea to Sinai - The Path of Faith Who would think that after all the miracles of the
Exodus, Bnei Yisrael would complain to God? Despite the Ten Plagues and
the Crossing of the Reed Sea, this parsha ends with repeated grumblings
by the Israelites. What is wrong with them? We are talking about the latter half of the Parsha.
In this section, the Jewish people have crossed the Yam Suf and are
making their way, stage by stage towards Har Sinai. The latter half of
the parsha contains a series of stories. They are: 1. 15:22-26
Mara 2. Ch. 16
The Manna 3. 17: 1-7
Masa U-Meriva 4. 17:8-15
Amalek In order to understand these stories, and the
complaints of Bnei Yisrael, we are going to take a look at these
episodes as a series. Rather than portraying these stories as
“complaint” stories, we shall view them as a process of growing up,
of transformation and learning. We shall chart the manner in which these
stories connect as they inform us of the spiritual journey taken by the
people as they travel from Egypt to Sinai. COMMON FACTORS In this shiur, we are going to focus upon the
three first stories. What strikes us immediately is the way in which
they deal with basic food requirements: 1. Marah - water 2. Manna - food. 3. Masa U-Meriva - water In each story, the nation lack a basic foodstuff,
food or water, and this is provided for them miraculously. So the first
things we can emphasise are FOOD and MIRACLES. In addition we have the notion of a TEST. All
these stories contain the element of a test. At Marah: “There he set for them a statute and a judgement AND THERE HE TESTED THEM.” (15:25) With the Manna: “In order to TEST
whether they will walk by my Torah or not.“ (16:5) And at Masa U-Meriva: “They tested God,
saying ‘Is God with us or not?’” (17:7) So there is an element of a test here. This is a
further unifying factor between the stories. Let us start to study them,
one by one, in order to determine what is happening here. MARAH “Then
Moses caused Israel to set out from the Sea of Reeds. They went on to
the wilderness of Shur; they travelled three days in the wilderness and
found no water. They came to Marah, but they could not drink water from
Marah because it (they) were bitter; that is why it was named Marah. And
the people grumbled against Moses saying ‘What shall we drink?’ He
cried to the Lord and the Lord showed him a tree . He threw it into the
water and the water became sweet. There he set for them statute and
judgment and there he put them to the test. He said ‘If you listen
well to the voice of the Lord your God, doing what is upright in his
sight, giving ear to his commandments and keeping all his laws, then I
will not bring upon you any of the diseases that I brought upon the
Egyptians for I the Lord am your healer.” (Exodus 15:22-26) A strange story. A thirsty nation, bitter waters,
a “magic” tree, statutes and judgments, the diseases of Egypt; What
is happening here? This is the first time that the people
“grumble”. It would seem that they are absolutely justified in their
complaint! They have been travelling for three days in the parched
desert. We can be sure that any water supplies that they brought with
them have been consumed. Could we expect them to be silent? Not even to
put in a request? Interestingly enough, we see no anger here, not on
the part of Moses nor from God. It would appear that God accepts the
request as legitimate and provides a solution to the water shortage. But this doesn’t really get to the bottom of the
issue because this episode seems to have a second less obvious theme. I
am referring to the strange inclusion of the teaching of a “statute
and commandment” and the promises about listening to God and obeying
his command. How does the water story and this emphasis on God’s law
and the Children of Israel’s acceptance of it, become a single story? A SET-UP The RASHBAM (15:25) puts it in the following way: “There
he set for them statute and judgment and there he put them to the test :
There at Marah, through the fabrication of a test - God made them thirst
for water and then ‘healed’ the water for them - He began to
demonstrate to them, that if they will keep the statutes and judgments
which He will teach, He will provide their needs.” The Rashbam notes an important side of this event.
It is all a “set-up” by God! He lead them on a route on which there
would be no water, he guided them to the bitter “marah” waters and
then he “healed” the waters making them fit for human consumption.
Why is God doing this? Let us explain the meaning of the “test.” Some
tests examine what you state you are in at present. A maths exam will
test whether you know algebra. A blood test will analyse the cholesterol
or iron in your blood. This type of test measures the current state of a
person. But there is another context in which we use the
notion of a test. If a person undergoes a testing situation, a moment of
unusual responsibility at work, a physically enduring experience, this
experience is in fact a growth experience. The person emerges stronger,
he has grown and learned from the experience. A soldier undergoing the
“testing” experience of basic training emerges more professional,
more resilient, and competent. In this test I emerge changed. The test
does not examine the current state of being. The test challenges a
person allowing them to grow, to change. One merges different than one
enters. It is this, second test which, I believe, the Rashbam is referring to here. This is a process of growth, of transformation. This is an educational opportunity. The Rashbam explains that God is teaching the Jewish people the most basic of lessons. That the national fortune of this people is tied up with their adherence to the word of God. This lesson will become a central motif, a fundamental theme of the Bible. God shows them how He can provide for their basic necessities. At the same time, God begins to talk about Torah and a new way of life. The verse tells us that they were taught “Statute and judgments”. According to RASHI, it was here that God presented Israel with their first commandments. It is a ploy. The people need water. God gives it
to them. He demonstrates the simple fact that He is their provider. BUT
at the same time, he begins to teach them His code of living. His
condition for relationship is a lifestyle of Mitzvot. WATER AND TORAH A famous rabbinic saying states that “words of
torah are compared to water” . It is interesting that this theme fits
in very closely with this narrative. This event - the thirsting for
water” - happens after three days in the wilderness;
“ ... they travelled three days in the wilderness and found no
water”. According to the projected plan of Moses, what was meant to
have happened on the third
day in the wilderness? What was planned for the third day after their
extraction from the clutches of Egypt? Moses himself has told us. It is
in the master plan. Every time Moses goes to Pharaoh he tells him that “We want to GO THREE DAYS into the wilderness to sacrifice to our God” (see 8:23 and other variations- 3:18, 5:3, 7:16, 10:11, 10:26) The end of the three day journey was meant to
herald a religious ceremony! And what religious ceremony could be more
central than the giving of the Torah? The Midrash, by way of a parable,
tells us that the people were looking for “water” ie. Torah,
at the end of these three days. It gives this as the reason why the
Torah is read publicly thrice weekly (Monday, Thursday and Shabbat), so
that “the people should not go three days without words of Torah” (Tanchuma
#19). Other elements of the story are reminiscent of a
Torah theme. The word “vayoreihu” - God showed him (the tree) - is
an unusual form containing the root of the word “torah”. The imagery
of the tree sweetening the water reminds us of the verse (referring to
Torah) “It is a tree of life to those who grasp it.” (Proverbs
3:18). Spiritual sustenance is as essential to a person as the physical
and this slave nation lacked both. God aims to provide food for the body
and for the soul. The Midrash has found an important parallel, for
this parsha is about finding Torah as much as it is about finding water.
After severing the ties with Egypt, God takes them through the
wilderness, building up a relationship with them. His aim, through a
series of events is to teach them the Torah is the source of life; it is
synonymous with it. MANNA The next story too; the Manna, repeats this theme.
The people get hungry. Note the date. It is “the fifteenth of the
Second Month,” They have been travelling for thirty days. No wonder
that their food is depleted. They have not had an opportunity to restock
for a month. God provides them with daily bread - the manna - but at the
same time begins to initiate them into the laws of the Sabbath. What is
happening here? What is this interesting combination- Manna and the
Sabbath? Here God is constructing an environment in which the nation
receive their basic food needs, but at the same time, learn about the
new tempo, the rhythm of their week – the Shabbat – which testifies
to God’s control over man, over earth. Again, we see God drawing a
parallel between physical sustenance and spiritual teaching. The process which we see unfolding here, is in
essence the gradual process of preparing for the giving of the Torah at
Mt. Sinai. For the people to accept its terms, they have to understand a
little of its content and essential ideas. It is this introduction: to
Shabbat, to “statutes and judgments” which helps them to taste a
sample of what is to come. The Mechilta puts it in the following way: “God
did not bring the people to Israel on the direct route. Instead he took
them through the desert. God said ‘ If I bring them to the Land of
Israel now, everyone will immediately involve themselves with their
field or vineyard and they will pay no attention to Torah! Instead, I
will take them through the wilderness. They will eat the manna and drink
water from the miraculous well (that God provided by hitting the rock
17:5) and the Torah will become absorbed within their body.” SLAVE MENTALITY Maybe we can suggest that this Midrash taps into
an important psychological phenomena - the psychology of the slave[1].
The Israelites are used to living as slaves.
Slaves are provided with rations so that they can work. The Egyptians
made sure that they had food. What do the Israelites remember? They
remember only that they were cared for there and provided for. But when
they find themselves hungry with no means of provision, they are
immediately lost. Like a child without their mother, they simply cry. A
simple need unfulfilled is a crisis for the slave. God uses this basic
need to establish a dependency upon Him. The people should understand
that God is their protector and provider. God will give them that
security that they seek so desperately. God wants them to be fully aware
that he is filling the vacuum created by their Exodus from Egypt. THE ROCK AT MOUNT SINAI This brings us to the third story. Moses hits the
Rock to provide the people with food. Does this story bring the people
nearer to Torah? God provides the people with water, but he teaches them
no Torah here. So how does this fit the pattern? “God said to Moshe: Pass before the people, take with you some o the Elders of Israel and the staff with which you struck the Nile river, and set out. I will be standing on the Rock at Horeb. Strike the Rock and the water will burst forth and the people will drink. And Moses did so in the sight of the Elders of Israel.” (17:5-6) Where does Moshe strike the rock? From where does
the water flow? From Mount Horeb, otherwise known as Mount Sinai! This
episode does not connect them to a particular mitzva or law, rather it
connects them to the SOURCE OF ALL LAW! Imagine the Israelites, parched in the wilderness.
There is no water. They protest to Moshe. He then takes his staff and
the leaders and walks out of the camp. Some hours later, the people are
overjoyed as they see the wadi adjacent to their encampment filled with
flowing water. They drink their fill, feed their children and animals,
they wash themselves and launder their clothes. They are overjoyed. But then imagine as they take their next journey
from Refidim to Horeb, to Sinai. They follow this life-giving wadi, to
the water source. At the source of the spring, at the waters source,
they receive the Torah, their source of spiritual sustenance. Once again
the physical mirrors the spiritual. They work in tandem. God, by
providing Israel’s physical needs, demonstrates they he is a worthy
protector, a parent-figure, who cares, who hears the nations needs. He
is a God of life. And it is precisely through the material things that
God creates a connection with the people. Only after that does he
progress to the spiritual covenant of Sinai. IN CONCLUSION. This parsha is about a transformation of a nation.
They sever their dependence on Pharaoh at the Red Sea and now they begin
learning a whole new system of faith and reliance. They undergo an
educational process. God initiates them into the realisation that Torah
is their food and water. It is these lessons that they will celebrate in
and struggle with throughout the course of their history. Shabbat shalom For further thought and investigation: How does the Amalek parsha fit into this process
that we have described? ·
See Rashi on 17:8: How does he view the
relationship between the parshiot in the light of this shiur? ·
On the other hand seethe Mishna in Rosh Hashanna, quoted by Rashi
on passuk 10: .
“And it was that when Moshe held up his hands Israel prevailed and
when he lowered his hands Amalek prevailed.” (Shemot 17:11) But could
the hands of Moses win a war or lose a war? Rather it comes to tell you
that whenever Israel looked upwards and committed their hearts to their
father in heaven, they prevailed, and if not, they fell….”
[1]
They are slaves in other senses too. The Ibn Ezra (14:13) asks; why
did the Israelites not fight the Egyptians when they were attacked
at the Red Sea. After all, the Israelites numbered six hundred
thousand fighting men, a considerable force. He answers:
“The Egyptians were masters to the Israelites. This
exodus generation was accustomed from the youngest age to suffer
under the yoke of Egyptian oppression. Their spirit was broken. How
could they stand up and fight their masters ... after all they were
inexperienced in the art of war....” |
|||
|
|
|||||||