|
|
|
|
|
Parshat
Nitzavim:
Individual and Nation In our Parsha, the Book of
Devarim reaches a crescendo, as the new generation, the people who
eagerly await their lives in Eretz Yisrael, enter into a covenant,
"that He (God) may establish you – today – as His people, and
he will be to you as a God." (29:12) A covenant is a contractual
relationship, and here, as the Wilderness generation commit themselves
exclusively to God, his laws and lifestyle, God reciprocates stating His
eternal commitment to Am Yisrael. This is historic stuff! Alongside
the positive aspects of the covenant comes a frighteningly severe
warning: "lest
there be among you man, or woman, or family, or tribe, whose heart turns
away this day from HaShem our G-d, to go to serve the gods of those
nations; lest there should be among you a root that bears gall and
wormwood; 18
and, when he hears the words of this curse, he will comfort himself
inside, saying: 'I shall have peace, despite my waywardness ….' 19
God will not be willing to pardon him, but then the anger of HaShem and
His jealousy will be fired up against that man, and the entire curse
that is written in this book shall be placed upon him; God shall wipe
out his name from under heaven; 20
and God shall separate him for evil of all the tribes of Israel,
according to all the curses of the covenant that is written in this book
of the law. 21
And the generation to come, your children that shall rise up after you,
and the foreigner that shall come from a far land, shall say, when they
see the plagues of that land, and the sicknesses that God has wrought 22
that the whole land is brimstone, and salt, and a burning … like the
overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboiim, which God overthrew
in His anger, and in His wrath; 23
All the nations shall say 'Why has God acted this way to this land? How
do we explain this great anger?' 24
Then people will reply: 'Because they forsook the covenant of HaShem,
the G-d of their fathers, which He made with them when He brought them
forth out of the land of Egypt.' (29:17-24) The warning concerns an
individual, or a group who simply don't care about Judaism. They say,
'I'll be fine! Let me live life my way, let me sin if I want to.'
Apparently God isn't that tolerant. He uses the metaphor of wormwood.
The Torah is concerned that deviant individuals will become a cancer in
the body-politic of Am Yisrael, sowing the seeds of non-observance of
our part of the covenant. "God will not forgive;" in fact,
"God will wipe out his name from under the heavens." THE PROBLEM:
INDIVIDUAL-FAMILY-TRIBE-NATION When I tried to study this
parsha some time ago, I read these pesukim and I felt confused. Who is
this parsha describing? - individual, group or nation? Let me explain. The parsha
begins by talking about (v.17) "a man, or woman, or a family, or a
tribe" who diverge from the norm, who "turn away" from
the normative commitment to God's law. We are definitely referring to a
minority grouping, a divergent and subversive faction. Verses 18-19 sound like we are
talking specifically about an individual who says "let me act
according to my random desires," ignoring God. But then, verse.20 informs us
that the transgressor is an entire tribe: " God will single him out
for catastrophe amongst all the tribes of Israel." But then, unexpectedly again,
the focus shifts. Passuk 21-24 seems to intimate that the catastrophe,
the devastating punishment will strike the entire land or the entire
nation: "23
All the nations shall say 'Why has God acted this way to this land? How
do we explain this great anger? ' 24
Then people will reply: 'Because they forsook the covenant of HaShem…'
" This is a collapse of national proportions, a national calamity.
The Parsha is sending mixed
messages here. Is this warning addressed to an individual or to a
collective, or possibly to the nation as a whole? THE LIMITS OF COMMUNAL
RESPONSIBILTY – RASHI. Rashi, our great commentator,
demonstrates a delicate sensitivity to the tension we have raised as to
whether the parsha is directed to the individual or the collective. He
comments on the passuk that concludes the parshia. The Passuk reads: "The
"hidden" are for Hashem our God, but the "revealed"
are for us and our children, for all time, to perform all the words of
this Torah." (29:28) Rashi comments: "If
you say, 'What are we to do? You punish the entire public due to the
hidden thoughts of the individual! It states, (v.17) 'Lest there is a
man…" and afterwards, "And they shall see the bombardment of
that land…" (v.21) – No one knows that which is deep in the
mind of another individual!' (God
replies,) 'I do not punish for the "hidden" things which are
"for Hashem our God." Indeed He will settle accounts with that
lone individual. However, the "revealed" things are "for
us and for our children" to eradicate evil from our midst, and with
these, if no action is taken, the public will be punished." Rashi makes a clear distinction
between sins that emerge into the public sphere and those that remain
hidden from view. Rashi says that certainly, this
parsha addresses the sins of individuals and the responsibility of the
collective. There are times in which society pays the price of the sins
of a lone individual, and there are times in which society is absolved
of responsibility. If a person's transgression is
private, in his own mind, his own domain, then Society need not, cannot,
get involved. God will take it up with him directly. But if there are
private individuals whose acts are publicly known, possibly causing a
detrimental effect, a subversive and corrosive influence upon the
surrounding community, then the "collective" is expected to
take action. The penalty for inaction here is that the entire community
will become culpable. If negative influence is allowed to roam free,
unrestrained and unchecked, then the entire society is to blame, and
will suffer the consequences, for their sin of negligence, of turning a
blind eye. In this case, society as a whole will be taken to task for
the sin of the individual. Regarding our parsha, we see how
the acts of the individual bring ruin upon the nation as a whole. HIZKUNI – The Slippery Slope. Obviously, we should wonder why
the public bears responsibility for the lone individual. We know that
"all Israel bear responsibility for one another," but can an
entire country suffer ruin for a sinful act of a lone person? The
Hizkuni claims that we are dealing with a sin of national proportions. "Could
it be that on God is furious with the entire community due to a sin of a
single individual? For an answer look at the story of the Idol of Micha,
whose roots grew. The entire Tribe of Dan served it, and eventually all
the Ten Tribes of Israel" What is the story of Micha's
Idol? This episode may be found in the Book of Shoftim (17-18). There we
read of a man named Micha who creates an image, an idol. He sets up a
temple around it, which becomes a popular tourist attraction. After
gaining some prestige, Michah's idol is adopted as an object of worship
for the tribe of Dan, in Northern Israel. They build an illicit temple
for it in the city of Dan. Centuries later, the same infamous site is
revived by Yerovam[1]
to set up his molten calf, the perennial site of Avoda Zara for the
Kingdom of Israel, and the Ten Tribes. The Hizkuni's example here ably
demonstrates how the creation of a single man moves through the strata
of family and tribe to influence the National culture. The Hizkuni talks of a process
whereby individual influences the tribe and the tribe stimulates the
entire nation to sin. Here the group, the nation, is culpable because
the entire nation are guilty of sin! "An
individual can cause enormous damage and loss by influencing an entire
family or Tribe." (ShaDal) Our parsha recognizes the
dangers of small things that spin out of control affecting larger
spheres which would have seemed to be beyond their field of influence.
The Hizkuni urges us to carefully check the wayward acts of every single
Jew, because a person's influence can be enormously devastating. INTERIM SUMMARY For Hizkuni, society bears guilt
only when society itself is guilt of crime. Only when the individual
seduces the Collective to sin does
Society find itself
culpable. For Rashi however, the very
awareness of a fellow Jew's sin already creates an sense of guilt, of
obligation to act. Even if the entire community remain absolutely pious,
wholly innocent, the
existence and awareness of incorrect and immoral behaviour within the
community imposes a sense of guilt. Maybe this philosophy is grounded in
a mystical notion of the connectedness of each and every Jew[2]. SEFAT EMMET – The Community
stands before God We have been discussing the
interplay between individual and collective. We should note that the
oscillation between person and community is inherent in the very opening
words of our Parsha. Nitzavim begins by addressing "Kulchem"
– everyone – but it then continues to specify sub-groups: Your
leaders, your tribes, judges, all men of Israel, your children, wives
the stranger in your midst…" The Sefat Emet comments: "
You are standing today, everyone, before God: "Today!" – Any
day, any moment in which one enters the community, (one stands before
God) because the communal entity is in an ongoing and constant state of
standing before God… This is the introduction to the notion of mutual
responsibility – by demonstrating that the Collective is dear and
special to God - that each and every Jew must take responsibility for
their fellow. And just as a single sin sours the collective, so the
merit of the Community helps each and every individual." (5638) The Sefat Emmet talks about the
power of the community. A Jewish Community by definition stands before
God at all times. Our very association with the Jewish collective gives
us energy, raises us to God. Rather than viewing the parsha
solely as telling the story of the individual that "poisons"
society, The Sefat Emmet reads the opening lines as teaching the
opposite message. It is about the positive effects of community –
"Kulchem!" – Together we stand before God. To look out for
another individuals failings is not the only lesson to be learned here.
Rather we shall stress the enormous positive energy of Am Yisrael that
can raise the individual and assist him to gain a contact point with
God. Shabbat Shalom and Ketiva
Vechatima Tova! [1] Hizkuni is assuming that Pessel Michah existed until the exile of the Ten tribes. This is a matter of dispute, some commentaries preferring to adopt the opinion that Pessel Michah came to an end at the start of Sefer Shmuel. To investigate this question further, see Shoftim 18:30-31 and the classic commentaries (Rashi, Ralbag, Radak) there. [2] In this regard, it is fascinating that the Gemara in Sanhedrin 43b suggests that this collective responsibility begins ONLY when Israel enter Eretz Yisrael. Maybe we can suggest that it is only in our land that we experience this unique aura of interconnectedness.
|
|||
|
|
|||||||